May 12, 2003
Republican Rep. Ernest Istook, known for his failed Religious Freedom
Amendment (RFA) and other similar radical proposals, is back at it. In
April, along with Democrat Rep. Sanford Bishop and 88 other cosponsors,
Istook introduced the "Pledge and Prayer Amendment," H.J. Res. 46.
Istook's ongoing pursuit of dangerous amendments under the guise of religious freedom reveals his lack of regard for religious freedom in its truest sense. Deceiving language, as always, is used to lure an uninformed populace into favoring his proposed amendment.
The wording is as follows: "To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience: The people retain the right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, including schools. The United States and the States shall not establish any official religion nor require any person to join in prayer or religious activity."
But our Bill of Rights already contains a religious freedom amendment -- the First-which says, "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. . ."
Yet this doesn't satisfy the Christian Right because the First Amendment protects the freedom of all Americans, while providing a wall between church and state. What the religious right wants is the freedom to proselytize in public schools and all government arenas -- and it wants to use our tax dollars in doing so. It favors conservative-Christian religious freedom, not the freedom to believe and practice as each American chooses.
At first glance, the proposed amendment appears harmless, but when dissected, serious flaws are uncovered. The first line, "To secure the people's right to acknowledge God according to the dictates of conscience." (identical to the wording in the failed RFA) doesn't allow for the freedom not to acknowledge God or to acknowledge many Gods, Buddha, or any other divine figure. By specifically using the term God, rather than religion as the First Amendment does, it creates a very illusive and different meaning.
The next phrase, "The people retain the right to pray and to recognize their religious beliefs, heritage, and traditions on public property, including schools," again, is a near-duplication of the wording of the RFA. But, the First Amendment already allows children to pray silently in the classroom and at lunch-time and even to form prayer groups before and after school on school grounds.
We also already have the freedom to pray silently at government meetings and in courtrooms; to use public schools, parks, and other facilities for religious gatherings; and to practice religion in our homes and churches. But the proposed Amendment would allow students and even administrators and teachers to invoke prayer and Bible readings in the classroom and to proselytize.
The one part of this proposal that suggests protection for others, "The United States and the States shall not establish any official religion nor require any person to join in prayer or religious activity." is already a protection under the First Amendment. But, the particular wording of the rest of the proposed Amendment, as described, would render this part meaningless.
The fact that government shall not "establish" or "require" religious activity wouldn't prevent minority students from feeling compelled when classmates or teachers are invoking or participating in classroom prayer. Would a child choose not to participate in a religious ritual, he or she would likely be ostracized, as has historically been the case when religion and prayer enter the public classroom.
Particularly revealing of the intent of this amendment is that the right to post the Ten Commandments in public schools and other public facilities is one its stated purposes. Not only has Istook acknowledged this, but it's included as part of the joint resolution.
The Pledge and Prayer Amendment, if ratified, would break down the wall between church and state, destroying religious freedom. Given the atmosphere since 9-11, our current war on Iraq, and Republican control in the House, Senate, and the Presidency, it seems a frightening possibility such an extreme measure could pass, unless the American people take a stand. The Pledge and Prayer Amendment is blatantly nothing more than an attack on religious freedom, which -- despite rampant violations that persist -- Americans currently truly possess. Let's fight to keep it that way.
· · · · · ·
Support Christ and Your Local Library - Matthew J. Barry (Dec. 2001)
America the 'beautiful' on Swans
Kimberly Blaker is editor and coauthor of The Fundamentals of Extremism: the Christian Right in America, New Boston Books, 2003, ISBNs 0-9725496-0-9 and 0-9725496-1-7, which has received excellent reviews (Nadine Strossen, Richard Dawkins, John M. Swomley...). Her commentaries have appeared in the Detroit Free Press, Detroit News, Los Angeles Daily News, San Francisco Examiner and other newspapers and publications.
Do you wish to share your opinion? We invite your comments. E-mail the Editor. Please include your full name, address and phone number. If we publish your opinion we will only include your name, city, state, and country.
Please, feel free to insert a link to this article on your Web site or to disseminate its URL on your favorite lists, quoting the first paragraph or providing a summary. However, please DO NOT steal, scavenge or repost this work without the expressed written authorization of Swans. This material is copyrighted, © Kimberly Blaker 2003. All rights reserved. No part of this material may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the publisher.
This Week's Internal Links
Seven Years And Going... - by Gilles d'Aymery
North Korea And International Law - by Nikhil Shah
Can You Spot The War Crime? - by Gregory Elich
Did We All Do A Clare Short? - by Baffour Ankomah
Maybe It Is Just Bush After All... - by Milo Clark
I Believe - by Scott Orlovsky
Freedom Dollars: Last Frontier for the New Pioneers - by Eli Beckerman
The New America - by Richard Macintosh
Curing The Pro-War Pandemic - by Philip Greenspan
Landing A Campaign Visual - by Deck Deckert
The Mud - by Michael Stowell
Looking For A Leader In 2004 - by Jan Baughman
A Moving Carol - by Alma A. Hromic
Letters to a Young Poet (Letter Four) - by Rainer Maria Rilke
Djinn Rummy Over Baghdad - Poem by Sabina C. Becker
He Who Damns A Lie Will Have To Answer To Me - Poem by Phil Rockstroh