(Swans - November 18, 2013) South Korean filmmaker Chung Ji-young has followed Unbowed, his remarkable film on judicial misconduct, with a searing look at repression under the military rule of Chun Doo-hwan in the 1980s. Released in its home country at the end of last year, National Security is among the most remarkable films to come out of South Korea in recent years. Given that no nation has a more vibrant and creative national cinema, that is another way of saying that National Security ranks as a major event in world cinema.
Based on true events, the film tells the story of a pro-democracy activist arrested in 1985 for violating the nation's National Security Law, which defined it as a crime to advocate communist ideas or to manifest sympathy with North Korea. Under military rule, the vaguely worded law was interpreted so loosely that any expression of opposition to military rule or any work done on behalf of democratization could lead to arrest, torture, and in some cases execution.
The law remains on the books, and under the conservative rule of South Korean president Park Geun-hye and her predecessor Lee Myung-bak, has been applied with increasing frequencyto crush opposition. In recent weeks, the government has filed a motion with the Constitutional Court to dissolve the Unified Progressive Party, the nation's third largest party, for violating the National Security Law by supposedly advancing socialist ideas. One of the party's members of the National Assembly, Lee Seok-ki, was arrested on trumped-up charges, along with several other party members. The Ministry of Justice has expanded its task force for hunting down activists and promises many more arrests to come. Prisoners are no longer tortured in South Korea, but Chung's film is highly relevant in an environment of escalating political repression, which has even extended to stripping the Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union of legal status, and launching raids on the Korean Government Employees' Union.
The Korean name for Chung's film, Namyeong-dong 1985, is the Seoul neighborhood in which the prison was located and the year in which the person on whose experience the film is based was tortured there. "My movie is titled National Security in English," Chung explains, "because wrongdoings have been perpetrated under the slogan of national security and still are."
The bulk of the film takes place in a single dark and confining interrogation room, oppressive in feel. The interrogators are out to extract a signed confession that would falsely link the Youth Federation for Democracy to North Korean control, and it is clear they have orders from higher up as part of a broader effort to smear the entire pro-democracy movement as a North Korean plot.
The film is unsparing in its approach. It is easy to see the ways such a film could have gone wrong in Hollywood hands, even granted the improbable assumption that Hollywood could be capable of making such an honest film. Chung's film will have none of that: it is brutally honest about the abuses that took place in South Korea's recent past and their echoing effects today. There is no "inspirational" saccharine triumph over adversity, nor is there an anodyne portrayal of characters and political questions.
The characters are all complex human beings, with a mix of motivations and emotions. For the police interrogators, torture is part of the daily routine. Low level torturers occasionally exhibit fleeting moments of empathy, usually suppressed by an awareness that promotion opportunity depends on the successful extraction of false confessions. The victim is torn between defiance and fear, and his determination to not to provide names conflicts with being unable to endure further torture.
The most chilling portrait is that of a man the others refer to by the nickname 'the Undertaker.' Driven by a mad passion to extirpate every trace of communist sentiment from South Korea, in which anything left of center qualifies, the Undertaker is regarded as an expert in his craft. When reporting to work, he brings his own briefcase of torture implements. This is a man who takes pride in his work, and he calmly whistles while inflicting torture on his victim. Late in the film, the Undertaker undergoes a religious conversion and expresses apparent remorse for his actions. The viewer is left wondering how real that remorse was, and the answer comes during the closing credits.
The scenes of torture are unrelenting. We see waterboarding, beatings, and electric shocks in all their brutality, and the film is explicit in demonstrating how the process dehumanizes both the victim and the perpetrators. It is impossible to watch the scenes of waterboarding and not feel outrage at the bland assurances from some U.S. officials that the practice does not constitute torture. Chung said his aim was to "really make the viewer feel how torture destroys the human soul," and in this he succeeded admirably. In viewing the film, I was struck by how the physical effect of torture began to seem secondary to the emotional impact on those at both ends of the experience.
Actor Park Won-sang plays the tortured activist, and his performance is astounding, conveying his character's inner torment in a powerful way even when sitting quietly huddled, wrapped in a blanket. His terror is palpable when faced with another round of torture. Park experienced extraordinarily harsh conditions in making this film in order to effectively convey the effect of torture. During the closing credits, short clips of interviews with 24 former victims of torture are shown, to moving effect.
"National Security was the most difficult film in my thirty-year film career," Chung remarks. "My purpose was to make the audience feel the pain. Many of our people remained silent while witnessing democracy being harmed, and this continues to this day."
Not surprisingly, the film remains without an American distributor. Do not look for it at your local multiplex. The film, however, is available on DVD by mail order from South Korea, and is in region-free NTSC format and is therefore playable on all North American units. National Security is a film not to be missed for those who care about the political state of the world and those who appreciate quality cinema. It will haunt your thoughts long after viewing.
Watch the trailer of the movie
If you find Gregory Elich's work valuable, please consider
Feel free to insert a link to this work on your Web site or to disseminate its URL on your favorite lists, quoting the first paragraph or providing a summary. However, DO NOT steal, scavenge, or repost this work on the Web or any electronic media. Inlining, mirroring, and framing are expressly prohibited. Pulp re-publishing is welcome -- please contact the publisher. This material is copyrighted, © Gregory Elich 2013. All rights reserved.
Have your say
Do you wish to share your opinion? We invite your comments. E-mail the Editor. Please include your full name, address and phone number (the city, state/country where you reside is paramount information). When/if we publish your opinion we will only include your name, city, state, and country.
About the Author
Gregory Elich is an independent researcher, a journalist, and an activist. (back)